Who’s who? Who are we rooting for? Who’s the good guy? I saw the ownage, but that sounded like Deepak was saying faith is insecurity, and the guy pointed out he was wrong. Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but from 3 years of being a regular at this blog, I think it is strongly against faith. So… explanation?
I’m a bit confused too, not sure how the hostile red shirt guy ‘owned’ him with a weak play on words, or why Chopra would have made the initial statement that seems to undermine his own stance (from the limited amount I know about him)?
Very clever – took me a second or two to get the joke, which it clearly was. Harmless fun, because I think everyone had a good laugh over it in the end.
Comments
12 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.Owned semantically… ?
I wonder if Chopra is still bleeding.
And the joke flew right over their heads…except for the bishop. Whodathunkit?
Who’s who? Who are we rooting for? Who’s the good guy? I saw the ownage, but that sounded like Deepak was saying faith is insecurity, and the guy pointed out he was wrong. Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but from 3 years of being a regular at this blog, I think it is strongly against faith. So… explanation?
Hey Dido, I want to know that too. I want to know who I am supposed to root for. Who is Deepak Chopra?
@Dido and Dfanatic
http://tinyurl.com/ykfkjav
Unlike “Star Trek”, where the Red Shirt Guy is always the first to get wasted, this Red Shirt Guy is my new hero!
Hey, thanks for the “Let me Google that for you.” First time I’ve come across it. Er, I know who Chopra is…
I’m a bit confused too, not sure how the hostile red shirt guy ‘owned’ him with a weak play on words, or why Chopra would have made the initial statement that seems to undermine his own stance (from the limited amount I know about him)?
Very clever – took me a second or two to get the joke, which it clearly was. Harmless fun, because I think everyone had a good laugh over it in the end.
And most importantly, who’s the blond chick?
she is a hooker for jesus, so don’t get too excited?
also, i second the comment “owned semantically…?”
This was hardly pwnage, just a silly witicism.