Inside the Lennon/McCartney Connection

A three part article from Slate that takes a look at Lennon & McCartney’s collaborative process.

According to the conventional wisdom, their drift apart had begun. But the increased distance sometimes functioned like the space between boxers in a ring—giving more room for a powerful shot. “He’d write ‘Strawberry fields,’ I’d go away and write ‘Penny Lane,’ ” McCartney said. “If I’d write ‘I’m Down,’ he’d go away and write something similar to that. To compete with each other. But it was very friendly competition because we were both going to share in the rewards anyway.”

Friendly, but with a sharp edge. “I would bring in a song and you could sort of see John stiffen a bit,” Paul said. “Next day he’d bring in a song and I’d sort of stiffen. And it was like, ‘Oh, you’re going to do that, are you? Right. You wait till I come up with something tomorrow.’ ”

The favorite back-and-forth—who was the real genius in the pair?—looks to set one on a pedestal. But when we look closely at the back and forth, that debate’s most cherished assumptions come into question—for example, that John charged ahead with the musical avant-garde while Paul nurtured traditional elements of melody and symmetry. It’s true that John tended to stick his finger in the audience’s eye while Paul usually preferred to coo to them. John’s “Revolution 9” may be the oddest, most dissonant thing ever laid down on a big pop album and Paul’s “Let It Be” and “Hey Jude” set a standard for sweetness and formal perfection.

2 Comments

  1. A researcher in my department studies creativity, and he was written extensively on case studies including Lennon/McCartney and Watson/Crick.
    He is most noted for getting exclusive access to sketches done by Picasso as he prepared to paint Guernica and doing extensive analysis on the process Picasso used. Its really interesting stuff.

    I know this is basically a plug, but here is his book:
    http://www.amazon.com/Creativity-Understanding-Innovation-Problem-Invention/dp/0471739995/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1286248270&sr=8-1

  2. John was Shiva, the destruction God of music, playing with the oddities and the uncertainties. Paul is Parvati, the female part, the perfect form, the beauty, the simmetry, etc.

    John is Revolution #9. Paul is Let it Be. John is Dyonisus, Paul is Apollo.

    Easy to wonder why they worked so well together 😉

Comments are closed.