The History Channel’s WWII Is Totally Unbelievable

From Squid314:

I think the worst offender here is the History Channel and all their programs on the so-called “World War II”.

Let’s start with the bad guys. Battalions of stormtroopers dressed in all black, check. Secret police, check. Determination to brutally kill everyone who doesn’t look like them, check. Leader with a tiny villain mustache and a tendency to go into apopleptic rage when he doesn’t get his way, check. All this from a country that was ordinary, believable, and dare I say it sometimes even sympathetic in previous seasons.

I wouldn’t even mind the lack of originality if they weren’t so heavy-handed about it. Apparently we’re supposed to believe that in the middle of the war the Germans attacked their allies the Russians, starting an unwinnable conflict on two fronts, just to show how sneaky and untrustworthy they could be? And that they diverted all their resources to use in making ever bigger and scarier death camps, even in the middle of a huge war? Real people just aren’t that evil. And that’s not even counting the part where as soon as the plot requires it, they instantly forget about all the racism nonsense and become best buddies with the definitely non-Aryan Japanese.

Not that the good guys are much better. Their leader, Churchill, appeared in a grand total of one episode before, where he was a bumbling general who suffered an embarrassing defeat to the Ottomans of all people in the Battle of Gallipoli. Now, all of a sudden, he’s not only Prime Minister, he’s not only a brilliant military commander, he’s not only the greatest orator of the twentieth century who can convince the British to keep going against all odds, he’s also a natural wit who is able to pull out hilarious one-liners practically on demand. I know he’s supposed to be the hero, but it’s not realistic unless you keep the guy at least vaguely human.

So it’s pretty standard “shining amazing good guys who can do no wrong” versus “evil legions of darkness bent on torture and genocide” stuff, totally ignoring the nuances and realities of politics. The actual strategy of the war is barely any better. Just to give one example, in the Battle of the Bulge, a vastly larger force of Germans surround a small Allied battalion and demand they surrender or be killed. The Allied general sends back a single-word reply: “Nuts!”. The Germans attack, and, miraculously, the tiny Allied force holds them off long enough for reinforcements to arrive and turn the tide of battle. Whoever wrote this episode obviously had never been within a thousand miles of an actual military.

(via PoorMoJo)

Comments

5 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.
  1. Mr. Knowitall,

    Well, when you put it that way…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Jim Buck,

    Spoiler alert. Don’t read this if you’ve not seen episode 1945 yet!

    Ending it all with an atomic bomb explosion was just plain lazy writing. It brought a sci-fi sensibility to what had, up to then, purported to be realist drama. I’m only thankful that they didn’t have the sun go supernova!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Ddes,

    I can’t help but think at least part of the lack of realism comes from the whole “history written by the victors” thing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Armelius,

    I like the parody between Patton and the ever wise Montgomery.
    Could we start WWII with the Versailles Treaty and the Japanese Embargo? No? Ok. How about when the Nazis tried to withdrawl their gold reserves from New York City, right in the middle of a depression?
    Can we at least have someone more evil? I am thinking Amin or Cortez or someone who had the sense to boycott the Olympic games.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. MadRat,

    The problem with this blog is I can’t use one of the “Not sure if serious” image macros when I really, really need it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Creative Commons License