From The Guardian:
“Profanity is extreme with 40 ‘f-words’. Sexual humour abounds and includes a scene of a man masturbating, others scenes of implied oral sex, and an extended scene dealing with a man who’s got his privates stuck in his zipper. In other scenes, the ‘villains’ give a woman’s dog amphetamines and barbiturates (at different times). Beyond doing that to the dog, it’s also electrocuted (trying to revive it, but also catching it on fire) and wrestled with (in a slapstick fashion).”
(via Arbroath)
Comments
6 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.Great link!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The first one’s funny but why are they concerned with offensive comments towards gays? Is this a Rainbow Baptist movie review?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Awesome. The Guardian is my favorite newspaper ever.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Damn, a little sanctimony, anyone?
Agreed, Circe, the Grauniad rocks.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’m a little surprised, though, that they didn’t use CAPreports. That’s the zenith of Christian censorship.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
What bothers me is that Borat doesn’t seem too bad from the description, compared to the other movies. Strange to see bad comments en Hairspray or The Devil wears prada but nothing infamous concerning Borat, just a description (which, I agree is quite enough) but nothing passionate.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0